![]() ![]() The reason why Sony and Canon files were at ISO 100 while Fuji was at 125 is because those are their base ISOs. No one tests with sharpening off because no one edits raw files without sharpening. Most likely the sharpening was set to a value, as it should be. If I’m missing something-or did the test wrong-please tell me, but I think I’m correct here. In actuality, the Fuji has *significantly* less noise when accurately matching exposures. I set the Noise reduction and sharpening for all three to “off,” set the Develop Profile to Adobe Color, set the Fuji image to +3.00 Exposure, and then chose Match Total Exposures for the Canon and Sony (which put them at +3.77). Doing so gives you a better overall comparison. This makes a difference in this test, and Lightroom notices the difference when you select all three images and choose “Match Total Exposures.” If I set the Fuji image to 3-stops overexposed, add the other two images to the selection and choose Match Total Exposures, Lightroom actually kicks the Canon and the Sony up to +3.77 overexposed. I also noticed for this test that the Sony and Canon images were shot at 100 ISO and f/1.4, while the Fuji was at 125 ISO and f/1.2, all at 1/4000. I say this as a full-time Canon user: I’d have to run that Mark II image through Topaz AI or DxO PureRAW before being able to deliver it to a client. I think the Fuji has an overall film-like grain to its underexposed image that could even be labeled as “aesthetically pleasing,” while both the Canon and Sony images have so much chroma noise, as to be unusable. I think your conclusion is incorrect here. This could be a result of the X-Trans sensor array. There is significant chroma noise in her hair for both the Canon and Sony, while almost no color noise with the Fuji. For the “3-stops Underexposed” test, the Fuji does have more overall noise, but I would argue that it’s luminance noise-like film grain-rather than chroma noise (color noise). ![]() I would be curious to see a repeat of the ISO tests with all noise reduction and sharpening set to Off.Ģ. It is entirely possible that Lightroom is applying different noise reduction and sharpening defaults for each camera, much like Fuji images have embedded lens profiles. This would be significantly relevant for the ISO tests. Are the Sharpening and Noise Reductions settings in Lightroom set to “off,” or to the “default” settings for each camera? I don’t think we should assume they were *identical* unless they were confirmed as being such. These new Duvo series look like they will be in direct competition with lenses such as the Canon CINE-SERVO 25-250mm T2.95 Cinema Zoom Lensįujifilm will showcase the HZK Standard zoom lens at NAB 2023 NAB.1. There is no indication of how much either lens weighs, but Fujifilm is stating that Duvo Portable standard and wide-angle zoom lenses will be able to accommodate a diverse range of filming styles such as filming on a tripod or having a camera on your shoulder. Just like the Duvo25-1000, these lenses adopt the Dual Format capability, which will make them compatible with both Super 35mm and full-frame-image sensors with the use of the built-in 1.5x expander. The standard zoom will have a focal range of 24-300mm. All we know is that one of the lenses will be a standard zoom lens and the other is a wide-angle zoom lens. The new lenses which have been added to the roadmap, are both portable and not a large box lens like the FUJINON HZK25-1000mm. ![]() Two new yet-to-be-named or announced portable lenses will join the FUJINON HZK25-1000mm (Duvo25-1000) which we previously covered on the site. Fujifilm has announced a development roadmap for the Duvo series of FUJINON broadcast zoom lenses that are compatible with large sensor cameras.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |